On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 16:47 +0530, RVK wrote: > Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >so it's new? so what? doesn't make it less true that it nowadays is a > >lot harder to exploit such bugs on recent distros. > > > > > > > How about using ProPolice etc ? that's also a good one; gcc 4.1 will have a propolice port included already. So I suspect all future distros will have this (once they make the jump to 4.1 or when they backport this) > > rvk > > >. > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Open source firewalls
- From: Vinay Venkataraghavan <[email protected]>
- Re: Open source firewalls
- From: Helge Hafting <[email protected]>
- Re: Open source firewalls
- From: RVK <[email protected]>
- Re: Open source firewalls
- From: Helge Hafting <[email protected]>
- Re: Open source firewalls
- From: RVK <[email protected]>
- Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- From: "Brian O'Mahoney" <[email protected]>
- Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- From: RVK <[email protected]>
- Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- From: RVK <[email protected]>
- Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- From: RVK <[email protected]>
- Open source firewalls
- Prev by Date: Inotify patch missed arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c
- Next by Date: Re: cx22702.c, 2.6.13-rc3 and a pci Hauppauge Nova-T DVB-T TV card
- Previous by thread: Re: Buffer Over-runs, was Open source firewalls
- Next by thread: [patch 1/3] inotify: move sysctl
- Index(es):
