Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Does it really matter?
>
Yes! At least for me and my union mounts implementation.
>
> I wonder if these should be in libfs - sysfs has the same problem, for
> example and someone might want to come along and fix that up too.
Ok, I will check that next week. But AFAIK, sysfs does not use the libfs
calls to modify directory contents. Therefore fixing the i_size problem
must be done inside the sysfs code. For hugetblfs etc. it would be
better to fix it in libfs.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |