Re: [PATCH] ramfs: pretend dirent sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Does it really matter?
>

Yes! At least for me and my union mounts implementation.

>
> I wonder if these should be in libfs - sysfs has the same problem, for
> example and someone might want to come along and fix that up too.

Ok, I will check that next week. But AFAIK, sysfs does not use the libfs calls to modify directory contents. Therefore fixing the i_size problem must be done inside the sysfs code. For hugetblfs etc. it would be better to fix it in libfs.

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux