Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks

[Sam Song <samlinuxkernel@yahoo.com>]

Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Well, in this case, the "whinging" resulted in
> finding a _real_ bug and locating why your ports 
> weren't being found.  So I guess it's
> good for something.

Indeed! The old kernel didn't have such an advantage.

> Can you mail me a diff of the changes you made to
> arch/ppc/platforms/sandpoint.h please?  

Certainly. 

> If that file is being used it seems that you 
> actually have 4 ports defined in total.  However,
> I'm a little confused because the sandpoint.h
> defines don't seem to match your original dmesg 
> output.

Well, I use a sandpoint-based board. Not the same as
the reference one. There are two serial ports on the
board and I enabled them both with IRQ9/10. 
In addition, No 8259 on this board.

Pls don't apply this patch:-)

Thanks,

Sam


		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Attachment: sandpoint-8250.diff
Description: 2389572820-sandpoint-8250.diff