Russell King <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, in this case, the "whinging" resulted in > finding a _real_ bug and locating why your ports > weren't being found. So I guess it's > good for something. Indeed! The old kernel didn't have such an advantage. > Can you mail me a diff of the changes you made to > arch/ppc/platforms/sandpoint.h please? Certainly. > If that file is being used it seems that you > actually have 4 ports defined in total. However, > I'm a little confused because the sandpoint.h > defines don't seem to match your original dmesg > output. Well, I use a sandpoint-based board. Not the same as the reference one. There are two serial ports on the board and I enabled them both with IRQ9/10. In addition, No 8259 on this board. Pls don't apply this patch:-) Thanks, Sam ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Attachment:
sandpoint-8250.diff
Description: 2389572820-sandpoint-8250.diff
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
- References:
- Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
- Next by Date: Re: [announce] linux kernel performance project launch at sourceforge.net
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
- Index(es):
