Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 14:08 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Audio did show slightly larger max latencies but nothing that would be of 
> significance.
> 
> On video, maximum latencies are only slightly larger at HZ 250, all the 
> desired cpu was achieved, but the average latency and number of missed 
> deadlines was significantly higher.

Because audio timing is driven by the soundcard interrupt while video,
like MIDI, relies heavily on timers.

Lee 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: NUMA support for dual core Opteron
• Next by Date: Patch for ub and blank CDs in 2.6.12
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]