Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> just doesn't realize that the latter is a bit more complicated exactly 
> because the latter is a hell of a lot more POWERFUL. Trying to get rid of 
> jiffies for some religious reason is _stupid_.

Getting rid of jiffies in its current form is a huge win for very
non-religious reasons. Jiffies is expensive in power management and
virtualisation because you have to maintain it.

Swap jiffies for jiffies() and the world gets a lot better. 

In actual fact you also want to fix users of

	while(time_before(foo, jiffies)) { whack(mole); }

to become

	init_timeout(&timeout);
	timeout.expires = jiffies + n
	add_timeout(&timeout);
	while(!timeout_expired(&timeout)) {}

Which is a trivial wrapper around timers as we have them now


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux