RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Russell
> King
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:57 AM
> To: karl malbrain
> Cc: Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org
> Subject: Re: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:16:23AM -0700, karl malbrain wrote:
> > I'd love to do a ps listing for you, but, except for the mouse,
> the system
> > is completely unresponsive after issuing the blocking open("/dev/ttyS1",
> > O_RDRW).
> >
> > Telnet is dead; the console will respond to the mouse, but the
> only thing I
> > can do is close the xterm window and thereby kill the process.
> I can launch
> > a new xterm window from the menu using the mouse, but the new
> window is dead
> > and has no cursor nor bash prompt.
> >
> > The clock on the display is being updated.  After several hours
> the system
> > reboots on its own.
> >
> > I recall from my DOS days that 8250/16550 programming requires that the
> > specific IIR source be responded to, or the chip will immediately
> > turn-around with another interrupt.  It doesn't look like 8250.c is
> > organized to respond directly to the modem-status-change value
> in IIR which
> > requires reading MSR to reset.
>
> Well, at this point interrupts are enabled, and _are_ handled.  The
> only thing we use the IIR for is to answer the question "did this
> device say it had an interrupt?"
>
> If it did, we unconditionally read the MSR without fail.
>
> So, I've no idea what so ever about what's going on here.  I don't
> understand why your system is behaving the way it is.  Therefore,
> I don't think we can progress this any further, sorry.

There is some code inserted at the top of the main receive_chars loop in
8250.c that examines  tty->flip.count and returns without reading UART_RX
under the condition that tty->flip.count is not reset after a call to
tty->flip.work.func.  This would leave the chip RX IIR unserviced and
subject another interrupt request.  Is it possible that this is the cause of
the problem?

karl m

Thanks, karl m



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux