Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

There's absolutely nothing wrong with "jiffies", and anybody who thinks that

	msleep(20);

is fundamentally better than

	timeout = jiffies + HZ/50;

just doesn't realize that the latter is a bit more complicated exactly because the latter is a hell of a lot more POWERFUL.

But if all I really want is to sleep for 20ms, what does the additional power actually buy me?

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux