Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>]

Linus Torvalds wrote:

> There's absolutely nothing wrong with "jiffies", and anybody who thinks 
> that
> 	msleep(20);
>
> is fundamentally better than
>
> 	timeout = jiffies + HZ/50;
>
> just doesn't realize that the latter is a bit more complicated exactly 
> because the latter is a hell of a lot more POWERFUL.
But if all I really want is to sleep for 20ms, what does the additional 
power actually buy me?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/