Re: About a change to the implementation of spin lock in 2.6.12 kernel.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:21 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Willy,
> 
> I think at least I can remove the LOCK instruction when the lock is already 
> held by someone else and enter the spinning wait directly, right?
If the lock is already held by someone else, the cpu is just going to
burn cycles until it's not. So why do you care?

-- 
Brandon Niemczyk

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux