2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:50:01PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <[email protected]>:
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote:
> > > > I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still
> > > > not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks?
> > >
> > > Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect for other platforms, and it sure
> > > looked like an arm-specific gcc problem (this was ages back, so
> > > perhaps its fixed by now).
> >
> > AFAIR gcc-3.4.3 was released after this conversation take place at linux-xfs,
> > maybe add something like this:
> >
> > #ifdef XSCALE
> > /* We need this because some gcc versions for xscale are broken. */
> > [patched version here]
> > #else
> > [original version here]
> > #endif
>
> no, just fix your compiler or let the gcc folks do it. Did anyone of
> the arm folks ever open a PR at the gcc bugzilla with a reproduced
> testcase? You're never get your compiler fixed with that attitude.
Yes, but a lof of people use older versions of compilers and suffer
from this bug.
I personally was very unhappy when lost my data.
Best regards,
Yura
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |