Re: [patch 1/9] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:29:18 -0700
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Please identify which of these patches you consider to be 2.6.13 material.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/9] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 1/9] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: usb mass storage bug
Next by Date: [00/11] -stable review
Previous by thread: [patch 1/9] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4
Next by thread: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/9] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]

Powered by Linux