Re: [stable] Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:49:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:44:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> 
> I think the patch is too risky for stable. I had even my doubts
> for mainline.

Ok, thanks, I've removed it out of the queue.

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [00/11] -stable review
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Aliased interfaces and binded sockets
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
• Previous by thread: Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
• Next by thread: Re: [11/11] x86_64: TASK_SIZE fixes for compatibility mode processes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]