Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

[Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:41:15PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> The RTC historically used to have a lower quality (cheaper) crystal than
> the 14.318 MHz crystal used for everything else. But with the spread
> spectrum modulation of frequency, the PIT may finally be worse to
> consider the RTC again.

32.768kHz crystals are pretty much standard for use in digital clocks.  
Checking an electronics catalogue shows a fairly reasonable -60ppm to 
+30ppm rating over the operating temperature range (implying the device 
is tuned for 20C room temperature).

> Another BIG problem with RTC is that it doesn't allow reading its
> internal counter like the PIT does, making TSC interpolation even harder.

That's one thing I truely dislike about the current timer code.  If we 
could program the RTC interrupt to come into the system as an NMI (iirc 
oprofile already has code to do this), we could get much better TSC 
interpolation since we would be sampling the TSC at a much smaller, less 
variable offset, which can only be a good thing.

		-ben
-- 
"Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once." -- John Wheeler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/