On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:26 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >
> > Going to HZ=864 would fix this problem. It would likely cause other
> > problems in places that expect 1/HZ to be a sane number, though.
> >
> But if you are going to an "odd" value, would 1381 would be a better
> choice, given the interest in minimizing latency currently evident?
No, I think 864 is quite good enough. 1381 seems overkill even for
multimedia, people who need that can use the RTC anyway.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |