Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks

Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> However, if you merely lifted the later 8250.c and
> put it into a previous kernel (which looks like the 
> case), there's other changes in addition which are 
> required.

Good catch. I tried 2.6.13-rc1 and the newest version
2.6.13-rc3 on the same target[MPC8241]. The whining 
remained the same. 

Thanks,

Sam


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Current kexec status?
• Next by Date: Re: system.map
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.13-git] 8250 tweaks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]