Hi.
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 08:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > | Update suspend documentation.
> > > |
> > > | Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> > > |
> > > | ---
> > > |
> > > | diff --git a/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt b/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt
> > > | --- a/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt
> > > | +++ b/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt
> > > | @@ -318,3 +318,10 @@ As a rule of thumb use encrypted swap to
> > > | system is shut down or suspended. Additionally use the encrypted
> > > | suspend image to prevent sensitive data from being stolen after
> > > | resume.
> > > | +
> > > | +Q: Why we cannot suspend to a swap file?
> > >
> > > Q: Why can't we suspend to a swap file?
> > > or
> > > Q: Why can we not suspend to a swap file?
> > >
> > > | +
> > > | +A: Because accessing swap file needs the filesystem mounted, and
> > > | +filesystem might do something wrong (like replaying the journal)
> > > | +during mount. [Probably could be solved by modifying every filesystem
> > > | +to support some kind of "really read-only!" option. Patches welcome.]
> >
> > This is wrong. Suspend2 has supported writing to a swap file for a long
> > time (since 1.0), without requiring the filesystem to be mounted when
> > resuming. We just need to store the bdev and block numbers in the image
> > header.
>
> Uh, and then you pass something like resume=/dev/hda5@BLOCKID on
> command line? Okay, that could work.
>
> Does this look fair?
>
> Q: Why can't we suspend to a swap file?
>
> A: Because accessing swap file needs the filesystem mounted, and
> filesystem might do something wrong (like replaying the journal)
> during mount.
>
> There are few ways to get that fixed:
>
> 1) Probably could be solved by modifying every filesystem to support
> some kind of "really read-only!" option. Patches welcome.
>
> 2) suspend2 gets around that by storing absolute positions in on-disk
> image, with resume parameter pointing directly to suspend header.
And a block size. (It affects the interpretation of the block number).
Apart from that, yes.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|