realtime-preempt + reiser4?

• To: [email protected]
• Subject: realtime-preempt + reiser4?
• From: Keenan Pepper <[email protected]>
• Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:55:06 -0400
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=suL5aJUlmBQdZXe/dR2q5eKolzkdcha+4KZo/JXIbgHyEV2aTC3a4jblK+XFOwsTuDoKvIdbd/S03c0ohyYDZk7ck29la7WxJhAzjAnthNZL5XXbcHBAn1DnwtbAVl8Dj1GuWUesfGOWnmFEyNLSGg6xU21zFpG4lzDOiyDxLEs=
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)

Ingo Molnar's realtime-preempt patches used to be based on the -mm kernels, but now they appear to be based on the mainline kernels, so they don't support reiser4 (at least until reiser4 is merged into mainline, which is looking uncertain as I understand it). Is realtime-preempt-2.6.10-mm1-V0.7.34-01 the most recent realtime-preempt kernel to support reiser4?

How is the latency of the reiser4 code itself?

Keenan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: realtime-preempt + reiser4?
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc1 03/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting
• Next by Date: schedule while atomic
• Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] enable ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU automatically if HOTPLUG_CPU=y
• Next by thread: Re: realtime-preempt + reiser4?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]