Re: [patch] s390: fadvise hint values.

> > Patch is attached, what do you think ?
>
> I'd rather fix the kernel and do some symbol versioning magic in
> glibc.  After all it's their stupidity that caused all these problems.

Well I was my stupidity that I copied the wrong fcntl.h file for s390-64.
The fcntl.h glibc header for alpha contained the "wrong" values and since
day 1 of the s390-64 port it has been 6 and 7 for us as well.

If we decide to fix the kernel we don't need to do anything in the glibc.

blue skies,
   Martin

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch] s390: fadvise hint values.
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Merging relayfs?
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] s390: fadvise hint values.
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] s390: fadvise hint values.
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: fix sysfs_chmod_file
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]