>When you say enable a lock, do you mean that you grabbed a lock? Now if
>you grabbed a spinlock, it is really bad to then call schedule, since a
>another process that will grab that same spinlock will deadlock the CPU
>(on an SMP system). Since you are using locks (I'm also assuming that
>you are using spinlocks) I assume that you will be running this on a
>CONFIG_PREEMPT or SMP system.
>
>So the fix will be to release the lock before calling something that
>will schedule, and regrab it afterwards.
>
>
Sorry for not being too precise. Yes, your assumptions were correct ;-)
I grab a lock using
spin_lock(&ieee->lock);
and release it using
spin_unlock(&ieee->lock);
there is quite a lot of debugging printk's inbetween. Can this be a cause ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |