On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric Piel wrote: > > Just by couriosity, I wonder how your processes are automatically > reniced to 10 ? > In my case, running from an xterm. Ken -- das eine Mal als Trag�, das andere Mal als Farce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
- Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
- Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Eric Piel <[email protected]>
- Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
- Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
- Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- From: Eric Piel <[email protected]>
- ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel header policy
- Next by Date: STDOUT to shell command
- Previous by thread: Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- Next by thread: Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
- Index(es):
