Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Eric Piel wrote:

>
> Just by couriosity, I wonder how your processes are automatically
> reniced to 10 ?
>

 In my case, running from an xterm.

Ken
-- 
 das eine Mal als Trag�, das andere Mal als Farce

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
  • Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
  • Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Eric Piel <[email protected]>
  • Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
  • Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]>
  • Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
    • From: Eric Piel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Kernel header policy
• Next by Date: STDOUT to shell command
• Previous by thread: Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
• Next by thread: Re: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]