On Tuesday 12 July 2005 13:36, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > > @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ dasd_fba_build_cp(struct dasd_device * d
> > > }
> > > cqr->device = device;
> > > cqr->expires = 5 * 60 * HZ; /* 5 minutes */
> > > + cqr->retries = 32;
> >
> > 2..4 maybe, but 32? This isn't tiny by any account.
>
> Are you arguing the use of the adjective "tiny" or the technical
> aspects of using 32 as the number of retries for dasd fba?
> In the dasd driver we use a retry count of 255 as "standard", so
> 32 is indeed much smaller than that. If you can call it tiny,
> well who cares??
I meant that 32 retries is too many. Retries tend to multiply.
If OS does N retries per failed attempt and disk drive does M
attempts per attempt, you end up with N*M retries.
Add a few 'retrying' layers, and you have a 'I cannot umount
this fscking scratched CDROM, maybe tomorrow' type disaster.
It's better to err to the smaller number of attempts.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |