Re: [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:17, David Lang wrote:
> which brings up another possible config option/test case, changing the
> read/write tests to try to do X MB/sec rather then the max possible speed
> (probably defaulting to max if nothing is specified)

That's a good idea. I was planning on adding a configurable cpu%/interval 
benchmark as well so configurable read/write is a logical addition. 

> thanks again for working to define a good test case

You're welcome, and thanks for feedback.

Cheers,
Con

Attachment: pgp2PdwG2tu2L.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark
    • From: David Lang <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SCSI luns
• Next by Date: Re: saa7134 card no longer working
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark
• Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]