Andrew Morton wrote:
OK, please let us know how it goes.
It went very well. I could find no problems at all. I've updated my script to use the new method, so please merge smaps :) http://www.pixelbeat.org/scripts/ps_mem.py Usually the shared mem reported by /proc/$$/statm is the same as summing all the shared values in in /proc/$$/smaps but there can be large discrepancies. In the real world you can see this with a newly started apache. On my system statm reported that apache was using 35MB, whereas smaps reported the correct amount of 11MB. These numbers will converge over time as the unused pages of the apache processes were swapped out. Attached is a mem.py script that triggers and reports the memory discrepancy on an smaps enabled system. As for the overhead of calling smaps, well comparing to /proc/$$/maps which does essentially the same thing only not walking mem, on my 1.6GHz P4, 384MB laptop, gives: time read_10K_smaps real 0m3.323s user 0m0.636s sys 0m2.660s time read_10K_maps real 0m1.742s user 0m0.300s sys 0m1.428s I've also attached a patch to make smaps output match the maps output, as smaps was not showing info like which map was heap and stack etc. The code is smaller also, as show_smap() now just calls show_map(). Note this patch is to be applied _after_ Hugh's changes. -- Pádraig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org --
#!/usr/bin/python import os, sys, time PAGESIZE=os.sysconf("SC_PAGE_SIZE")/1024 #KiB #stat = {Shared,Rss} #file = {smaps,statm} def getMemStat(pid,stat,file): if file=="smaps": shared_lines=[line for line in open("/proc/"+str(pid)+"/smaps").readlines() if line.find(stat)!=-1] return sum([int(line.split()[1]) for line in shared_lines]) else: if stat == "Shared": stat_index=2 elif stat == "Rss": stat_index=1 return int(open("/proc/"+str(pid)+"/statm").readline().split()[stat_index])*PAGESIZE a="\x00"*(32*1024*1024) #alloc 32MiB pid=os.fork() if(not pid): time.sleep(1) sys.exit() for file in ["statm", "smaps"]: rss=float(getMemStat(pid,"Rss",file)) shr=float(getMemStat(pid,"Shared",file)) print "/proc/%d/%s reports %.1f%% shared" % (pid,file,((shr/rss)*100)) os.wait()
Attachment:
linux-2.6.13-rc2-mm1-hd-smaps.diff
Description: TeXInfo document
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- From: Mauricio Lin <[email protected]>
- Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- References:
- How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- From: [email protected]
- Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- From: [email protected]
- Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- Prev by Date: Re: [ltp] IBM HDAPS Someone interested? (Userspace accelerometer viewer)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12.2 dies after 24 hours
- Previous by thread: Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- Next by thread: Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- Index(es):