Re: Kernel header policy

* Marc Aurele La France ([email protected]) wrote:
> To that end, I would propose, as a possible technical solution, extending
> the kernel build process to detect these errors during kernel development.

Well, couple stupid comments:

#1: I'm not *entirely* sure Linus reads every mail to lkml..  Dunno if
    you also sent it to him directly, but if not then that might explain
    the lack of response...

#2: Have you got a patch that does this?  If not, you might want to
    write one up and just submit it..  If you're expecting someone else
    to write it, well, that might also be why you've not had much
    response... :)

    	Thanks,

		Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

---

• References:
  • Kernel header policy
    • From: Marc Aurele La France <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 20/29v2] Add Service Record support to SA client
• Next by Date: Re: [NOT solved] Kernel 2.6.12 + IO-APIC + uhci_hcd = Trouble
• Previous by thread: Kernel header policy
• Next by thread: Re: Kernel header policy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]