Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT

Why per node? Why not go the whole way and make it per CPU?

I would also not define it statically, but allocate it at boot time
in node local memory.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpuset.c: add kerneldoc, fix typos
• Next by Date: [patch 2.6.13-rc2] all archs: add "__slow" tag for slow code
• Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]