Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT

Why per node? Why not go the whole way and make it per CPU?

I would also not define it statically, but allocate it at boot time
in node local memory.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
  - From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpuset.c: add kerneldoc, fix typos
Next by Date: [patch 2.6.13-rc2] all archs: add "__slow" tag for slow code
Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]