Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum

Hi!

> >>enums in C are (de?)promoted to integral types under most conditions, so 
> >>the type-checking is useless.
> >
> >
> >It's a warning in gcc afaik and spare should complain as well.
> 
> Check again.

Check sparse with -Wbitwise and enum properly marked as bitwise...

									Pavel
-- 
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree
  - From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
  - From: Bryan Henderson <[email protected]>
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]>
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
  - From: Mike Waychison <[email protected]>
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]>
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
  - From: Mike Waychison <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] V850: [PATCH resend] C99 initializers for hw_interrupt_type structures
Next by Date: [PATCH] MIPS: [PATCH resend] C99 initializers for hw_interrupt_type structures
Previous by thread: Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]