* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I can reproduce priority leakage on my SMP system; any userspace process
> > chrt'ed up and a lot will follow. This makes the system very
> > unresponsive when doing a make -j5. Verified on 51-{6,18,23}.
> >
>
> The following patch seems to fix it for me, YMMV.
>
> --- kernel/sched.c~ 2005-07-08 10:27:59.000000000 +0200
> +++ kernel/sched.c 2005-07-10 13:00:42.000000000 +0200
> @@ -780,7 +780,8 @@ static void recalc_task_prio(task_t *p,
> }
> }
>
> - p->prio = p->normal_prio = effective_prio(p);
> + p->prio = effective_prio(p);
> + p->normal_prio = unlikely(rt_prio(p->normal_prio)) ? p->prio : __effective_prio(p);
> }
ahh, indeed, this code did not take boosting into account. Good catch!
I'm wondering why this only showed up on SMP. I've fixed it a bit
differently in my tree, by making the roles of the various priority
fields and functions more obvious, see the delta patch below. I've also
released the -51-23 patch with these changes included. Does this fix
priority leakage on your SMP system?
Ingo
Index: linux/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ extern int idle_cpu(int cpu);
extern int sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *, int, struct sched_param *);
extern task_t *idle_task(int cpu);
extern void mutex_setprio(task_t *p, int prio);
-extern int mutex_getprio(task_t *p);
+extern int normal_prio(task_t *p);
void yield(void);
void __yield(void);
Index: linux/kernel/rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/rt.c
+++ linux/kernel/rt.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static void pi_setprio(struct rt_mutex *
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_DEADLOCK_DETECT
pi_prio++;
- if (p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL && prio > mutex_getprio(p)) {
+ if (p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL && prio > normal_prio(p)) {
TRACE_OFF();
printk("huh? (%d->%d??)\n", p->prio, prio);
Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static inline void enqueue_task_head(str
}
/*
- * effective_prio - return the priority that is based on the static
+ * __normal_prio - return the priority that is based on the static
* priority but is modified by bonuses/penalties.
*
* We scale the actual sleep average [0 .... MAX_SLEEP_AVG]
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static inline void enqueue_task_head(str
* Both properties are important to certain workloads.
*/
-static inline int __effective_prio(task_t *p)
+static inline int __normal_prio(task_t *p)
{
int bonus, prio;
@@ -670,57 +670,53 @@ static inline int __effective_prio(task_
prio = MAX_RT_PRIO;
if (prio > MAX_PRIO-1)
prio = MAX_PRIO-1;
- return prio;
-}
-static int effective_prio(task_t *p)
-{
- if (rt_task(p))
- return p->prio;
- return __effective_prio(p);
-}
-
-static inline void trace_start_sched_wakeup(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
-{
- if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq) && (p != rq->curr))
- __trace_start_sched_wakeup(p);
+ return prio;
}
/*
- * __activate_task - move a task to the runqueue.
+ * Calculate the expected normal priority: i.e. priority
+ * without taking RT-inheritance into account. Might be
+ * boosted by interactivity modifiers. Changes upon fork,
+ * setprio syscalls, and whenever the interactivity
+ * estimator recalculates.
*/
-static inline void __activate_task(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
+inline int normal_prio(task_t *p)
{
- trace_special_pid(p->pid, p->prio, rq->nr_running);
- enqueue_task(p, rq->active);
- rq->nr_running++;
+ int prio;
+
+ if (p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL)
+ prio = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 - p->rt_priority;
+ else
+ prio = __normal_prio(p);
+
+ trace_special_pid(p->pid, p->prio, prio);
+ return prio;
}
/*
- * __activate_task_after - move a task to the runqueue,
- * to execute after a specific task.
+ * Calculate the current priority, i.e. the priority
+ * taken into account by the scheduler. This value might
+ * be boosted by RT tasks, or might be boosted by
+ * interactivity modifiers. Will be RT if the task got
+ * RT-boosted. If not then it returns p->normal_prio.
*/
-static inline
-void __activate_task_after(task_t *p, task_t *parent, runqueue_t *rq)
+static void __recalc_task_prio(task_t *p)
{
- // FIXME: to head rather?
- list_add_tail(&p->run_list, &parent->run_list);
- p->array = parent->array;
- p->array->nr_active++;
- rq->nr_running++;
- inc_rt_tasks(p, rq);
+ p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
+ /*
+ * If we are RT tasks or we were boosted to RT priority,
+ * keep the priority unchanged. Otherwise, update priority
+ * to the normal priority:
+ */
+ if (!rt_prio(p->prio))
+ p->prio = p->normal_prio;
}
/*
- * __activate_idle_task - move idle task to the _front_ of runqueue.
+ * Recalculate p->normal_prio and p->prio after having slept,
+ * updating the sleep-average too:
*/
-static inline void __activate_idle_task(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
-{
- enqueue_task_head(p, rq->active);
- rq->nr_running++;
- WARN_ON(rt_task(p));
-}
-
static void recalc_task_prio(task_t *p, unsigned long long now)
{
/* Caller must always ensure 'now >= p->timestamp' */
@@ -780,7 +776,48 @@ static void recalc_task_prio(task_t *p,
}
}
- p->prio = p->normal_prio = effective_prio(p);
+ __recalc_task_prio(p);
+}
+
+static inline void trace_start_sched_wakeup(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+ if (TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq) && (p != rq->curr))
+ __trace_start_sched_wakeup(p);
+}
+
+/*
+ * __activate_task - move a task to the runqueue.
+ */
+static inline void __activate_task(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+ trace_special_pid(p->pid, p->prio, rq->nr_running);
+ enqueue_task(p, rq->active);
+ rq->nr_running++;
+}
+
+/*
+ * __activate_task_after - move a task to the runqueue,
+ * to execute after a specific task.
+ */
+static inline
+void __activate_task_after(task_t *p, task_t *parent, runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+ // FIXME: to head rather?
+ list_add_tail(&p->run_list, &parent->run_list);
+ p->array = parent->array;
+ p->array->nr_active++;
+ rq->nr_running++;
+ inc_rt_tasks(p, rq);
+}
+
+/*
+ * __activate_idle_task - move idle task to the _front_ of runqueue.
+ */
+static inline void __activate_idle_task(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+ enqueue_task_head(p, rq->active);
+ rq->nr_running++;
+ WARN_ON(rt_task(p));
}
/*
@@ -1415,7 +1452,7 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(task_t *
p->sleep_avg = JIFFIES_TO_NS(CURRENT_BONUS(p) *
CHILD_PENALTY / 100 * MAX_SLEEP_AVG / MAX_BONUS);
- p->prio = p->normal_prio = effective_prio(p);
+ __recalc_task_prio(p);
if (likely(cpu == this_cpu)) {
if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
@@ -1427,7 +1464,8 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(task_t *
if (unlikely(!current->array))
__activate_task(p, rq);
else {
- p->prio = p->normal_prio = current->prio;
+ p->prio = current->prio;
+ p->normal_prio = current->normal_prio;
__activate_task_after(p, current, rq);
}
set_need_resched();
@@ -2730,6 +2768,10 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
/*
* RR tasks need a special form of timeslice management.
* FIFO tasks have no timeslices.
+ *
+ * On PREEMPT_RT, boosted tasks will also get into this
+ * branch and wont get their timeslice decreased until
+ * they have done their work.
*/
if ((p->policy == SCHED_RR) && !--p->time_slice) {
p->time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
@@ -2744,7 +2786,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
if (!--p->time_slice) {
dequeue_task(p, rq->active);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
- p->prio = p->normal_prio = effective_prio(p);
+ __recalc_task_prio(p);
p->time_slice = task_timeslice(p);
p->first_time_slice = 0;
@@ -3682,7 +3724,7 @@ void set_user_nice(task_t *p, long nice)
new_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
delta = new_prio - old_prio;
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
- p->prio += delta;
+ __recalc_task_prio(p);
if (array) {
enqueue_task(p, array);
@@ -3712,18 +3754,6 @@ int can_nice(const task_t *p, const int
capable(CAP_SYS_NICE));
}
-int mutex_getprio(task_t *p)
-{
- int prio;
-
- if (p->policy != SCHED_NORMAL)
- prio = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 - p->rt_priority;
- else
- prio = __effective_prio(p);
- trace_special_pid(p->pid, p->prio, prio);
- return prio;
-}
-
/*
* Used by the PREEMPT_RT code to implement
* priority inheritance logic:
@@ -3880,10 +3910,7 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct task_s
BUG_ON(p->array);
p->policy = policy;
p->rt_priority = prio;
- if (policy != SCHED_NORMAL)
- p->prio = p->normal_prio = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 - p->rt_priority;
- else
- p->prio = p->normal_prio = p->static_prio;
+ __recalc_task_prio(p);
}
/**
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-12
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-12
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-12
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-12
- Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-12
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |