Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86

* randy_dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to clarify this, "boot tested" does not mean that this changed 
> code was tested, right? or do you have a test case that was tested?

i tested segfaults, but not bus-faults. The bug would have resulted in 
sigsegv being delivered not a sigbus.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
  - From: randy_dunlap <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
Next by Date: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
Next by thread: Re: [patch] compress the stack layout of do_page_fault(), x86
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]