Re: [PATCH] [18/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 501-tlb-flushing-functions.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!


> diff -ruNp 510-version-specific-mac.patch-old/arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_feature.c 510-version-specific-mac.patch-new/arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_feature.c
> --- 510-version-specific-mac.patch-old/arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_feature.c	2005-06-20 11:46:45.000000000 +1000
> +++ 510-version-specific-mac.patch-new/arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_feature.c	2005-07-04 23:14:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -2291,7 +2291,10 @@ static struct pmac_mb_def pmac_mb_defs[]
>  	},
>  	{	"PowerBook5,1",			"PowerBook G4 17\"",
>  		PMAC_TYPE_UNKNOWN_INTREPID,	intrepid_features,
> -		PMAC_MB_HAS_FW_POWER | PMAC_MB_MOBILE,
> +		PMAC_MB_HAS_FW_POWER | PMAC_MB_MOBILE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTWARE_REPLACE_SLEEP
> +		| PMAC_MB_CAN_SLEEP,
> +#endif

There's different number of ","s depending on CONFIG_... Is that ok?



> diff -ruNp 510-version-specific-mac.patch-old/arch/ppc/syslib/of_device.c 510-version-specific-mac.patch-new/arch/ppc/syslib/of_device.c
> --- 510-version-specific-mac.patch-old/arch/ppc/syslib/of_device.c	2004-11-03 21:55:03.000000000 +1100
> +++ 510-version-specific-mac.patch-new/arch/ppc/syslib/of_device.c	2005-07-04 23:14:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int of_device_remove(struct devic
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int of_device_suspend(struct device *dev, u32 state)
> +static int of_device_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
>  {
>  	struct of_device * of_dev = to_of_device(dev);
>  	struct of_platform_driver * drv = to_of_platform_driver(dev->driver);

Can I have these separately?

> diff -ruNp 510-version-specific-mac.patch-old/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c 510-version-specific-mac.patch-new/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c
> --- 510-version-specific-mac.patch-old/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c	2005-07-06 11:25:14.000000000 +1000
> +++ 510-version-specific-mac.patch-new/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c	2005-07-04 23:14:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -2894,6 +2894,13 @@ pmu_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct f
>  			return -EACCES;
>  		if (sleep_in_progress)
>  			return -EBUSY;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTWARE_REPLACE_SLEEP
> +		{
> +		extern void software_suspend_pending(void);
> +		software_suspend_pending();
> +		return (0);
> +		}
> +#endif
>  		sleep_in_progress = 1;
>  		switch (pmu_kind) {
>  		case PMU_OHARE_BASED:

Indentation? And use return 0; not return (0);

									Pavel

-- 
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux