Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:01:33PM +0200, blaisorblade@yahoo.it wrote:
> diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c
> --- linux-2.6.git/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue	2005-07-09 13:01:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.git-paolo/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c	2005-07-09 13:01:03.000000000 +0200
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int setup_signal_stack_si(unsigned long 
>  
>  	frame = (struct rt_sigframe __user *)
>  		round_down(stack_top - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) - 8;
> -	((unsigned char *) frame) -= 128;
> +	frame -= 128 / sizeof(frame);

Are you sure these two are identical?

The above code fragment looks suspicious anyway, particularly:

 	frame = (struct rt_sigframe __user *)
 		round_down(stack_top - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) - 8;

which will put the frame at 8 * sizeof(struct rt_sigframe) below
the point which round_down() would return (which would be 1 struct
rt_sigframe below stack_top, rounded down).

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/