--On Friday, July 08, 2005 16:03:03 -0700 Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:59:35PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
>> I think we're talking between 2.6.12-git5 and 2.6.12-git6 right? I
>> can confirm more explicitly if really need be. 48s -> 45.5s elapsed.
>
> That's a huge difference (5%) --- what hardware is that on?
16 CPU x440 (about a 2-3 year old NUMA box). flat 4x seems about a 1%
gain, still statistically significant, but definitely smaller.
I'm not saying there isn't data supporting higher HZ ... I just haven't
seen it published. I get the feeling what people really want is high-res
timers anyway ... high HZ is just concealing the issue and making it
slightly less crap, not actually fixing it.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |