Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We're not gonna add hooks to the kernel so you can copile the same
> horrible code you had before against it out of tree. Do a sane demux
> and submit it.
If I just wanted hooks, I would have submitted a patch that did just
that, without any logging function. The code for the mux that goes
on top of that code is actually on its way to be completely rewritten.
I can see that you may have read my posting as indicating that we were
recompiling the same previous code out of tree, but that is certainly
not the intent.
FWIW, we'll look submitting a minimal mux with the patch.
Karim
--
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || [email protected] || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |