Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree

Hi,

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > +#define PNODE_MEMBER_VFS  0x01
> > +#define PNODE_SLAVE_VFS   0x02
> 
> Enums, please.

Is this becoming a requirement now? I personally would rather leave that 
to personal preference...

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: share/private/slave a subtree
    • From: "Pekka J Enberg" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
    • From: Ram <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PREEMPT_RT and mptfusion
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc1 01/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
• Next by thread: Re: share/private/slave a subtree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]