Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree

Hi,

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > +#define PNODE_MEMBER_VFS  0x01
> > +#define PNODE_SLAVE_VFS   0x02
> 
> Enums, please.

Is this becoming a requirement now? I personally would rather leave that 
to personal preference...

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: share/private/slave a subtree
  - From: "Pekka J Enberg" <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
  - From: Ram <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
  - From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PREEMPT_RT and mptfusion
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc1 01/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] share/private/slave a subtree
Next by thread: Re: share/private/slave a subtree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]