>From Dominik Brodowski on Thursday, 07 July, 2005:
>On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:51:17PM -0500, Joseph Pingenot wrote:
>> >Just a latest question: can be p4-clockmod used together with
>> >speedstep-centrino? If not, would it make any sense to patch
>> >speedstep-centrino to use this feature too?
>> I'm a little confused. How is this different from the ACPI CPU throttling
>> states (/proc/acpi/processor/CPUn/limit to set, throttling to see all
>> T-states available)?
>T-states _tend_ to be utilized using chipset logic, while p4-clockmod is
>done in-CPU.
>> On my 1.5-year-old Pentium-M, frequency scaling and T-states are different
>> beasties, and act entirely differently. I'm currently in the process of
>> rewriting my governor's brain to deal with the two more intelligently.
>In your case, I would care about throttling. In very most cases it actually
>increases energy consumption, as the state being entered is technically the
>same to ACPI C2 (IIRC), so it is only "forced" idling and only useful if
>"forced" idling is needed to not need active cooling.
Why would this cause more energy consumption?
-Joseph
--
trelane@digitasaru.net--------------------------------------------------
Graduate student in physics, Free Software developer.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |