Hi!
> > Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You
> > removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.
>
> I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
> just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
> What would you like to see happen?
When/if suspend2 is merged and working, there's no reason to keep
swsusp around. So patches for removing swsusp1 are quite okay at the
end of series. OTOH it is one more patch for you to maintain, so... do
whatever you want.
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |