On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:54:46PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > >Which would neither need VFS changes nor be dependent on Reiser4 in >any way, so I don't see why this thread lives on. Just get down to >business and implement this metafs =) I've been gone for a while and suddenly drowning in mail... Anyway, I don't really like the metafs thing. To access the data, you still need to refactor userspace, so that's not a real advantage. Doing lookups from /meta all the time, instead of in the file-as-dir-whatever... And the best thing to do would be to bring these "Reiser4-specific" enhancements to every FS. -- mjt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- References:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: David Weinehall <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- Prev by Date: Re: How do you accurately determine a process' RAM usage?
- Next by Date: Re: OOPS: frequent crashes with bttv in 2.6.X series (inc. 2.6.12)
- Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Next by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Index(es):
