On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 23:44 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Hubert Chan wrote: > >And a question: is it feasible to store, for each inode, its parent(s), > >instead of just the hard link count? > > > > > Ooh, now that is an interesting old idea I haven't considered in 20 > years.... makes fsck more robust too.... Hey, sounds like the idea I proposed a couple months ago of storing the path names in each file, instead of in directories. Only better, since each path component isn't text but a link instead. It still has the performance and locking problem of having to update every child file when moving a directory tree to a new parent. On the other hand, maybe the benefit is worth the cost. -- Jonathan Briggs <[email protected]> eSoft, Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hubert Chan <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- References:
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: "Alexander G. M. Smith" <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hubert Chan <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: reiser4 plugins
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] securityfs
- Next by Date: Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide?
- Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Next by thread: Re: reiser4 plugins
- Index(es):