On Wednesday 06 Jul 2005 19:41, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > does the patch below help? We initialized the timestamps to 0, but
> > with jiffies starting out negative, that means a ~5 minutes gap until
> > we first reach a value of 0. That would explain the messages. The only
> > thing it doesnt explain, why did this only trigger on your box?
>
> here's an updated patch - it will print out all timestamps too. (you'll
> have to revert all previous softlockup patches first, via patch -R.)
>
> Ingo
>
Yep, thanks, that fixed it. I don't know why it only shows up on my
configuration, but it was a bug, and this patch fixes it. I also took the
liberty of upgrading to -06 while I was doing it, so I think you can probably
release -07 with the specified changes.
So far no lockups, either, but I'm not convinced they're gone forever. I'll
let you know how it goes.
--
Cheers,
Alistair.
personal: alistair()devzero!co!uk
university: s0348365()sms!ed!ac!uk
student: CS/CSim Undergraduate
contact: 1F2 55 South Clerk Street,
Edinburgh. EH8 9PP.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |