Adrian Ulrich wrote:
so all we have left is the issue of whether using /meta costs us
performance, or whether breaking POSIX to add a symlink (such as
foo/...) really gives us that much more usability.
IMHO '/meta' isn't such a good idea, because a chrooted application
won't be able to use it.
mount --bind. Is there a performance hit for having too many of those?
mount --bind /meta/vfs/some/chroot /some/chroot/meta
Also, maybe a separately-mounted /meta, maybe with something like
'-o root='
I can't think of when you'd have a chrooted application that uses /meta,
but wasn't written with /meta in mind, so as to have these mount
commands in its init scripts.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |