Hi.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:22, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > diff -ruNp 604-utility-header.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h 604-utility-header.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h
> > --- 604-utility-header.patch-old/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h 1970-01-01 10:00:00.000000000 +1000
> > +++ 604-utility-header.patch-new/kernel/power/suspend2_core/utility.h 2005-07-05 23:48:59.000000000 +1000
>
> Please do move these.
Okay.
> > +
> > +extern int suspend_snprintf(char * buffer, int buffer_size, const char *fmt, ...);
>
> What's wrong with regular snprintf?
If there's a buffer overrun, it returns the number of bytes it wanted to
use, not the number actually used.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |