Re: FUSE merging? (2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see your point.  But then this is really not a security issue, but
> an "are you sure you want to format C:" style protection for the
> user's own sake.  Adding a mount option (checked by the library) for
> this would be fine.  E.g. with "mount_nonempty" it would not refuse to
> mount on a non-leaf dir, and README would document, that using this
> option might cause trouble.  Otherwise the mount would be refused with
> a reference to the above option.

IMO that should be a generic mount option, not FUSE specific.
Maybe the default could vary for each fs, but I'd vote against that.
-- 
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux