Quoting Tony Jones ([email protected]):
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:59:02AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
>
> > > The topic of replacing dummy (with capability) was discussed there
> > > last week, in the context of stacker, but a common solution for both
> > > cases would be needed.
> >
> > Both cases?
>
> CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER and !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER ;-)
>
> http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2005-June/6200.html
>
> I was assuming (bad of me I know) that Serge's patch would nail both cases
> with one stone.
Yes, sorry, I never got around to the replace-dummy-with-capability
patch. There wasn't a single cry when Chris asked for anyone who'd
care about dummy being removed, so I do plan on switching that.
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |