randy_dunlap wrote:
>+The DMA:able address space is the lowest 16 MB of _physical_ memory.
> The DMA-able
>+Also the transfer block may not cross page boundaries (which are 64k).
> I would write: (which are 64 KB).
>
>if I knew that was correct, but I don't.
>Does Linux limit all ISA-DMA to not crossing 64 KB boundaries?
>I haven't looked at the code yet, just PC-AT Technical Reference,
>which says that DMA controller 1 is limited to 8-bit transfers and
>64 KB blocks and DMA controller 2 is limited to 16-bit data transfers
>and 128 KB boundaries.
>Does i386-compatible and later chipsets or LPC change/affect this?
>(I see that you cover 8/16-bit transfers later in the doc.)
>
>
Sorry, my bad. 128k is quite correct for 16-bit data transfers. I've
just been using 8-bit transfers so I got a bit too familiar with just
those. :)
>+To translate the virtual address to a physical use the normal DMA
>+API. Do _not_ use isa_virt_to_phys() even though it does the same
>+thing. The reason for this is that you will get a requirement to ISA
>+(instead of only ISA_DMA_API).
>
>I don't understand what you are trying to say in:
>... is that you will get a requirement to ISA....
>Oh, it's Kconfig-related, right? So maybe:
>"... is that you will get a config requirement for ISA..." ?
>
>
>
Yes, that's what I'm trying to say. I'll try to make it clearer.
Thanks for the feedback. I'll get your suggestions in and post a new patch.
Rgds
Pierre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|