Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Kurt Garloff wrote:

> capablities is used. These are not called via indirect calls but 
> called as hardcoded calls and might thus be inlined; the price for
> this is a conditional -- benchmarks done by hp showed this to be
> beneficial (on ia64).

What about on i386, x86_64 or ppc64?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional
    • From: Kurt Garloff <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional
    • From: Kurt Garloff <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] LSM hooks consolidation
• Next by Date: Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]