On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Zero _is_ a valid IRQ number.
Not for a "legacy irq" it ain't.
If the ACPI layer itself decides to use IRQ0, then that's fine, and that
path hasn't changed at all.
However, if ACPI doesn't find any irq, and ends up just using whatever irq
the device had for some legacy reason, then irq 0 just means "nobody set
an irq".
Besides, we'll actually be returning 0 _anyway_. The only thing my patch
fixes (and it _is_ a fix) is that we won't be stupidly thinking that we
actually have a valid irq, and that we should turn it level-sensitive.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |