Rogério Brito wrote:
Is there any estimated possibility of including an update from the
linux1394 team in future versions of -mm or, even better, pushing them to
Linus's tree?
That is what usually happens. But the sbp2 related diffs between 2.6.13
and linux1394 are not an update by linux1394 but rather a rewrite by the
scsi folk. Unfortunately, that rewrite was not tested by the linux1394
team. (And was therefore not checked in at svn.linux1394.org. Lack of
manpower was one factor.) So, applying the sbp2 portion of your diff is
a back-out, not an update.
I have a question: Do you need _both_ the sbp2 back-out and ieee1394's
disable_irm parameter, or only one of them?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=-= -=== ---=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |