On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:27:45PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
>
> BTW speaking of initramfs to hold the minimal /dev, in the embedded
> world initramfs has to be stored in flash as udev binary and eventually
> additionnal scripts, this represent flash memory (OK very little I have
> to admit but when you need to find 10K of flash or change the flash
> size...).
Why? Why not put it in ROM with your kernel image, look at how the
kernel build process does it with the "built-in" initramfs.
If that doesn't work, initrd still works just as well for udev, that's
what RH does.
> I hope someone will pick-up your nano defvs proposal and enhance it to
> support a version enabling to boot a system without anything in /dev.
I boot my boxes with nothing in /dev and have been for almost a year
now. udev works just fine for this, and so do some other programs that
work like udev does.
I hope everyone can just forget about my nano devfs proposal, and just
pass it off as a example of someone who went temporarily insane.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|