Move the poll_lock and poll_owner to the struct net_device. This change is
important for the bonding driver support, as multiple real devices will
point at the same netpoll_info. In such cases, we would be artificially
limiting ourselves to calling the polling routine of only one member of a
bond at a time.
To understand how this benefits the bonding driver, let's consider a
netpoll client that sends packets in response to receiving packets. Let's
assume a packet comes in on eth0, and the response is to be delivered over
eth1. If the poll_lock lived in the npinfo (and hence, there was only one
per bond), then we would have to queue the packet. With this patch in
place, we can send the outbound packet immediately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
---
--- linux-2.6.12/net/core/netpoll.c.orig 2005-07-01 14:52:11.932101811 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.12/net/core/netpoll.c 2005-07-01 14:53:59.322183590 -0400
@@ -131,19 +131,20 @@ static int checksum_udp(struct sk_buff *
static void poll_napi(struct netpoll *np)
{
struct netpoll_info *npinfo = np->dev->npinfo;
+ struct net_device *dev = np->dev;
int budget = 16;
- if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state) &&
- npinfo->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
- spin_trylock(&npinfo->poll_lock)) {
+ if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &dev->state) &&
+ dev->poll_owner != smp_processor_id() &&
+ spin_trylock(&dev->poll_lock)) {
npinfo->rx_flags |= NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
atomic_inc(&trapped);
- np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
+ dev->poll(dev, &budget);
atomic_dec(&trapped);
npinfo->rx_flags &= ~NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
- spin_unlock(&npinfo->poll_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dev->poll_lock);
}
}
@@ -246,7 +247,6 @@ repeat:
static void netpoll_send_skb(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
int status;
- struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
repeat:
if(!np || !np->dev || !netif_running(np->dev)) {
@@ -255,8 +255,7 @@ repeat:
}
/* avoid recursion */
- npinfo = np->dev->npinfo;
- if (npinfo->poll_owner == smp_processor_id() ||
+ if (dev->poll_owner == smp_processor_id() ||
np->dev->xmit_lock_owner == smp_processor_id()) {
if (np->drop)
np->drop(skb);
@@ -641,8 +640,6 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
npinfo->rx_flags = 0;
npinfo->rx_np = NULL;
- npinfo->poll_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
- npinfo->poll_owner = -1;
npinfo->rx_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
} else
npinfo = ndev->npinfo;
--- linux-2.6.12/net/core/dev.c.orig 2005-07-01 14:52:08.613655521 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.12/net/core/dev.c 2005-07-01 14:52:38.495669512 -0400
@@ -3069,6 +3069,10 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev(int size
setup(dev);
strcpy(dev->name, name);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
+ dev->poll_owner = -1;
+ dev->poll_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+#endif
return dev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_netdev);
--- linux-2.6.12/include/linux/netpoll.h.orig 2005-07-01 14:52:16.016420312 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.12/include/linux/netpoll.h 2005-07-01 14:52:38.495669512 -0400
@@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ struct netpoll {
};
struct netpoll_info {
- spinlock_t poll_lock;
- int poll_owner;
int rx_flags;
spinlock_t rx_lock;
struct netpoll *rx_np; /* netpoll that registered an rx_hook */
@@ -63,16 +61,16 @@ static inline int netpoll_rx(struct sk_b
static inline void netpoll_poll_lock(struct net_device *dev)
{
if (dev->npinfo) {
- spin_lock(&dev->npinfo->poll_lock);
- dev->npinfo->poll_owner = smp_processor_id();
+ spin_lock(&dev->poll_lock);
+ dev->poll_owner = smp_processor_id();
}
}
static inline void netpoll_poll_unlock(struct net_device *dev)
{
if (dev->npinfo) {
- dev->npinfo->poll_owner = -1;
- spin_unlock(&dev->npinfo->poll_lock);
+ dev->poll_owner = -1;
+ spin_unlock(&dev->poll_lock);
}
}
--- linux-2.6.12/include/linux/netdevice.h.orig 2005-07-01 14:52:22.666310731 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.12/include/linux/netdevice.h 2005-07-01 14:52:38.496669345 -0400
@@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ struct net_device
int (*neigh_setup)(struct net_device *dev, struct neigh_parms *);
#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
+ spinlock_t poll_lock;
+ int poll_owner;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
void (*poll_controller)(struct net_device *dev);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |