Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)

Andrew Morton wrote:

Linus, Andrew, do you consider this critical enough to be merged to the v2.4 tree?

No.  I'd expect this would hurt more people than it would benefit.

Probably.
Does that mean that the kernel 2.4 will keep this bug for ever?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)
    • From: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: PCI-X support
• Next by Date: Re: PCI-X support
• Previous by thread: Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)
• Next by thread: Re: setitimer expire too early (Kernel 2.4)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]