Removes the PF_FROZEN flag and introduces TASK_FROZEN. This allows a simplification
of the locking for software suspend and helps clean up race conditions.
Also remove many inline functions to follow the coding style in other locations.
Beware: compiles fine not tested since I need to move on to other issues
now. But this is my best stab at how this could be fixed in the time that
I could spend with the issue.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Index: linux-2.6.12/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.12.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2005-07-01 04:50:46.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.12/include/linux/sched.h 2005-07-01 08:58:49.000000000 +0000
@@ -110,8 +110,9 @@ extern unsigned long nr_iowait(void);
#define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 2
#define TASK_STOPPED 4
#define TASK_TRACED 8
-#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 16
-#define EXIT_DEAD 32
+#define TASK_FROZEN 16
+#define EXIT_ZOMBIE 32
+#define EXIT_DEAD 64
#define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)
@@ -808,7 +809,6 @@ do { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&(tsk)->usa
#define PF_FLUSHER 0x00001000 /* responsible for disk writeback */
#define PF_USED_MATH 0x00002000 /* if unset the fpu must be initialized before use */
#define PF_NOFREEZE 0x00008000 /* this thread should not be frozen */
-#define PF_FROZEN 0x00010000 /* frozen for system suspend */
#define PF_FSTRANS 0x00020000 /* inside a filesystem transaction */
#define PF_KSWAPD 0x00040000 /* I am kswapd */
#define PF_SWAPOFF 0x00080000 /* I am in swapoff */
@@ -1270,14 +1270,6 @@ extern void normalize_rt_tasks(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
/*
- * Check if a process has been frozen
- */
-static inline int frozen(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return p->flags & PF_FROZEN;
-}
-
-/*
* Check if there is a request to freeze a process
*/
static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1285,36 +1277,6 @@ static inline int freezing(struct task_s
return test_ti_thread_flag(p->thread_info, TIF_FREEZE);
}
-/*
- * Request that a process be frozen
- */
-static inline void freeze(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- set_ti_thread_flag(p->thread_info, TIF_FREEZE);
-}
-
-/*
- * Wake up a frozen process
- */
-static inline int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- if (frozen(p)) {
- p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
- wake_up_process(p);
- return 1;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * freezing is complete, mark process as frozen
- */
-static inline void frozen_process(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- p->flags |= PF_FROZEN;
- clear_ti_thread_flag(p->thread_info, TIF_FREEZE);
-}
-
extern void refrigerator(void);
extern int freeze_processes(void);
extern void thaw_processes(void);
@@ -1328,11 +1290,7 @@ static inline int try_to_freeze(void)
return 0;
}
#else
-static inline int frozen(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
-static inline void freeze(struct task_struct *p) { BUG(); }
-static inline int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) { return 1; }
-static inline void frozen_process(struct task_struct *p) { BUG(); }
static inline void refrigerator(void) {}
static inline int freeze_processes(void) { BUG(); return 0; }
Index: linux-2.6.12/kernel/power/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.12.orig/kernel/power/process.c 2005-07-01 04:50:46.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.12/kernel/power/process.c 2005-07-01 08:58:49.000000000 +0000
@@ -37,20 +37,21 @@ void refrigerator(void)
/* Hmm, should we be allowed to suspend when there are realtime
processes around? */
long save;
- save = current->state;
- current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
+
pr_debug("%s entered refrigerator\n", current->comm);
printk("=");
- frozen_process(current);
+ save = current->state;
+ current->state = TASK_FROZEN;
+ while (test_thread_flag(TIF_FREEZE))
+ schedule();
+ current->state = save;
+
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
recalc_sigpending(); /* We sent fake signal, clean it up */
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- while (frozen(current))
- schedule();
pr_debug("%s left refrigerator\n", current->comm);
- current->state = save;
}
/* 0 = success, else # of processes that we failed to stop */
@@ -67,14 +68,12 @@ int freeze_processes(void)
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
do_each_thread(g, p) {
unsigned long flags;
- if (!freezeable(p))
- continue;
- if ((frozen(p)) ||
- (p->state == TASK_TRACED) ||
- (p->state == TASK_STOPPED))
+
+ if (!freezeable(p) ||
+ (p->state & (TASK_FROZEN | TASK_TRACED | TASK_STOPPED)))
continue;
- freeze(p);
+ set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_FREEZE);
spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
signal_wake_up(p, 0);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
@@ -85,6 +84,7 @@ int freeze_processes(void)
if (time_after(jiffies, start_time + TIMEOUT)) {
printk( "\n" );
printk(KERN_ERR " stopping tasks failed (%d tasks remaining)\n", todo );
+ thaw_processes();
return todo;
}
} while(todo);
@@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ void thaw_processes(void)
do_each_thread(g, p) {
if (!freezeable(p))
continue;
- if (!thaw_process(p))
- printk(KERN_INFO " Strange, %s not stopped\n", p->comm );
+ if (test_and_clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_FREEZE))
+ wake_up_state(p, TASK_FROZEN);
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
Index: linux-2.6.12/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.12.orig/fs/proc/array.c 2005-06-17 19:48:29.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.12/fs/proc/array.c 2005-07-01 09:07:05.000000000 +0000
@@ -133,8 +133,9 @@ static const char *task_state_array[] =
"D (disk sleep)", /* 2 */
"T (stopped)", /* 4 */
"T (tracing stop)", /* 8 */
- "Z (zombie)", /* 16 */
- "X (dead)" /* 32 */
+ "F (frozen)", /* 16 */
+ "Z (zombie)", /* 32 */
+ "X (dead)" /* 64 */
};
static inline const char * get_task_state(struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -143,7 +144,8 @@ static inline const char * get_task_stat
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE |
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE |
TASK_STOPPED |
- TASK_TRACED)) |
+ TASK_TRACED |
+ TASK_FROZEN)) |
(tsk->exit_state & (EXIT_ZOMBIE |
EXIT_DEAD));
const char **p = &task_state_array[0];
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|