On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Ville Sundell wrote:
> Sorry guys!
> I say it wrong way, I mean:
> Other programs would like use build-in and "standard" linux XML-parser.
>
Applications should be using whatever the libraries available to them
provide. This does *not* belong in the kernel.
> It would make standard way to read xml-files in Linux?
> Advertise speech:
> No more 1 000 different XML readers, only one, and people can
> make it better :D
>
Diversity is good. Competition between projects often benefits the end
users. If you want to write a better XML parsing library, or to assist
one of the existing projects, please do so (after you have identified
whatever shortcomings you see in the existing choices) - but in
userspace. And in userspace you will find that many potential users of
an xml parser are kernel-agnostic - they run on linux 2.2 or 2.4 (which
are in maintenance mode), BSDs, and others.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]